Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Transit Mix Concrete & Materials Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 6, 2013
Docket06-12-00117-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Transit Mix Concrete & Materials Company (Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Transit Mix Concrete & Materials Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Transit Mix Concrete & Materials Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-12-00117-CV

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

V.

TRANSIT MIX CONCRETE & MATERIALS COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 10C0001-102

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. ORDER Julie Mayes Hamrick, counsel for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, has filed a motion

to extend time to file the appellant’s brief. The brief was due February 4, 2013.

In her motion, counsel does not provide the Court with a reasonable explanation of the

need for an extension of time, stating only that the “extension is requested because Appellant’s

attorney will be unable to complete the Brief by the due date because of the complexity of the

legal issues presented, and because of counsel’s responsibilities on other urgent client matters.”

This Court interprets Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b)(1) as requiring counsel to

provide specific information to justify a requested extension of time, including the cause

numbers of other briefs filed, the dates they were filed, trial dates, the length or expected length

of trials, etc. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1). Broad, general statements concerning counsel’s

workload do not provide the required facts and are not adequate to meet the requirements of the

rule. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1).

All future motions to extend time must contain case-specific information adequate to

justify the requested extension, or they will be denied.

In this instance, we grant the motion and extend the deadline for filing appellant’s brief

by thirty days, making the brief due March 6, 2013. Further requests for extensions will not be

looked upon with favor.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: February 6, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Transit Mix Concrete & Materials Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-mutual-insurance-company-v-transit-mix-con-texapp-2013.