Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Harden

70 S.E.2d 89, 85 Ga. App. 830, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 838
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 19, 1952
Docket33914
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 70 S.E.2d 89 (Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Harden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Harden, 70 S.E.2d 89, 85 Ga. App. 830, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 838 (Ga. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

85 Ga. App. 830 (1952)
70 S.E.2d 89

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al.
v.
HARDEN.

33914.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided March 19, 1952.
Rehearing Denied April 2, 1952.

Neely, Marshall & Greene, for plaintiff in error.

E. B. Shaw, contra.

*834 FELTON, J.

1. The Court of Appeals may set aside an order or decree of the Directors of the Workmen's Compensation Board if there is not sufficient competent evidence in the record to warrant the directors in making the order or decree complained of, or if the order or decree is contrary to law. Code, § 114-710.

2. "In order for a death to be compensable to a dependent under the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Law, it must result instantly from an accident arising out of and in the course of employment, or later result proximately therefrom; and the burden of proof is on the claimant to show that the death so resulted." Johnson v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co., 79 Ga. App. 187 (1) (53 S. E. 2d, 204). Therefore, in the instant case, the claimant had the burden of proving that the skull fracture received by her husband in his fall on October 26, 1948, proximately caused the "embolism or blood clot to the left lung" which resulted in his death on September 19, 1950; and, since even that testimony of the medical witnesses most favorable to the claimant was problematical and conjectural, the claimant failed to carry such burden of proof; and, further, the claimant's evidence at its best was consistent with either of two opposing theories and therefore proved neither (Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta v. Haynie, 46 Ga. App. 522 (1), 168 S. E. 112; Taylor v. State, 44 Ga. App. 387, 417, 161 S. E. 793; American Mutual Liability Ins. Co. v. Harden, 64 Ga. App. 593, 595, 13 S. E. 2d, 685); and the court erred in affirming the award of the full board.

Judgment reversed. Sutton, C. J., and Worrill, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Buford v. Thomas
347 S.E.2d 713 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Zippy Mart, Inc. v. Fender
317 S.E.2d 575 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Fowler v. City of Atlanta
157 S.E.2d 306 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Gennett Lumber Co. v. Stanley
114 S.E.2d 437 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Parks v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.
104 S.E.2d 624 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Landen
91 S.E.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Federated Mutual Hardware Insurance v. Elliott
76 S.E.2d 568 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Marks
76 S.E.2d 507 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 S.E.2d 89, 85 Ga. App. 830, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-mutual-ins-co-v-harden-gactapp-1952.