Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Fowlkes Plumbing
This text of Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Fowlkes Plumbing (Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Fowlkes Plumbing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 18-60608 Document: 00515337772 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2020
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED March 9, 2020 No. 18-60608 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, as subrogee of Chickasaw County School District,
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
FOWLKES PLUMBING, L.L.C.; SULLIVAN ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; QUALITY HEAT ; AIR, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellants
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:17-CV-10
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* While contractors were restoring windows at a school, a fire broke out that destroyed the school. The school district’s insurer paid for the damage, but then brought this subrogation claim against the contractors. In response, the contractors asserted that a subrogation waiver in their agreement with the school district bars the suit. The district court disagreed, holding that the subrogation waiver relieves the contractors of liability only for damage to the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-60608 Document: 00515337772 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/09/2020
No. 18-60608 windows that were the focus of their work. The waiver does not, in the district court’s view, apply to the damage to the rest of the school. Recognizing that the scope of the subrogation waiver is a close question on which courts around the country have disagreed, the district court authorized an interlocutory appeal, which we accepted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). We then certified the question to the Supreme Court of Mississippi. See Liberty Mut. Fire Insur. Co. v. Fowlkes Plumbing, L.L.C., 934 F.3d 424 (5th Cir. 2019). The Supreme Court of Mississippi ruled that “the waiver of subrogation applies to work and non-work property.” Liberty Mut. Fire Insur. Co. v. Fowlkes Plumbing, L.L.C., -- So. 3d --, 2020 WL 830904, at *4 (Miss. Feb. 20, 2020). It explained that the subrogation waiver “operates as a blanket waiver of property damage to the extent that the property is covered by insurance.” Id. at *2. It further reasoned that the “phrase ‘to the extent the property is covered by insurance’ means that any damage that is paid by insurance proceeds is covered.’” Id. Because the Supreme Court of Mississippi has concluded that the subrogation waiver covers all damage to the school, the waiver provides the contractors with a complete defense to this subrogation suit. Accordingly, we REVERSE the district court’s ruling and RENDER judgment dismissing the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Fowlkes Plumbing, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-mutual-fire-insurance-v-fowlkes-plumbing-ca5-2020.