Liberty Lumber Co. v. Enecks
This text of 98 S.E. 97 (Liberty Lumber Co. v. Enecks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In an ordinary claim ease the claimant is entitled to a verdict in his favor if he shows title in himself, and the question whether he is liable to pay the debt on which the execution is founded is not properly triable in the ease. The question is not as to the claimant’s liability for the debt, but as to his title to the property levied on. By filing his claim he asserts merely that the property is not subject to sale under the execution. In such a case, in the absence of a suitable amendment or of proper equitable pleas, the plaintiff in fi. fa. can not introduce evidence which tends to show merely that in good conscience and equity the claimant is liable for the debt. Civil Code, 5407-8-9-12; Gormerly v. Chapman, 51 Ga. 421; Hamberger v. Easter, 57 Ga. 72; [312]*312Ford v. Holloway, 112 Ga. 851 (38 S. E. 373); Southern Mining Co. v. Brown, 107 Ga. 264, 269 (33 S. E. 73).
2. Under the foregoing ruling, the court erred, in admitting, over the claimant’s timely and appropriate objections, the evidence set forth in the first special ground of the motion for a new trial;
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 S.E. 97, 23 Ga. App. 311, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-lumber-co-v-enecks-gactapp-1919.