Liberty Highway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Liberty Highway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

172 N.E. 376, 121 Ohio St. 623, 121 Ohio St. (N.S.) 623, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 236

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 18, 1929

Docket21930

StatusPublished

This text of 172 N.E. 376 (Liberty Highway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liberty Highway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 172 N.E. 376, 121 Ohio St. 623, 121 Ohio St. (N.S.) 623, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 236 (Ohio 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged that the order of the said Public Utilities Commission of Ohio be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reasons that the commission had jurisdiction over all parties in the premises and that the continuance for the purpose of advertising in the counties where publication had not theretofore been made was within the power of the commission, and such action was neither unreasonable nor unlawful; that the modification of the commission’s order so as to permit the deletion of its former order of rates published to and from Chatfield, Jeromesville, Johnsville, Mifflin and Reedsburg, and its order establishing the proposed local freight tariff P. U. C. O. No. 14, as modified by such deletion, is not against the manifest weight of the evidence and is neither unreasonable nor unlawful.

Order affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Robinson, Matthias, Dat and Allen, JJ., concur. Jones, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged that the order of the said Public Utilities Commission of Ohio be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reasons that the commission had jurisdiction over all parties in the premises and that the continuance for the purpose of advertising in the counties where publication had not theretofore been made was within the power of the commission, and such action was neither unreasonable nor unlawful; that the modification of the commission’s order so as to permit the deletion of its former order of rates published to and from Chatfield, Jeromesville, Johnsville, Mifflin and Reedsburg, and its order establishing the proposed local freight tariff P. U. C. O. No. 14, as modified by such deletion, is not against the manifest weight of the evidence and is neither unreasonable nor unlawful.

Order affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Robinson, Matthias, Dat and Allen, JJ., concur. Jones, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 N.E. 376, 121 Ohio St. 623, 121 Ohio St. (N.S.) 623, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-highway-co-v-public-utilities-commission-ohio-1929.