Liberty Bank of Buffalo v. Lansing

259 A.D. 797, 18 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6696
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 1940·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: In demanding both equitable and legal relief in his answer, the defendant Wallace has placed himself in the same position, so far as the right to a jury trial is concerned, as if he had demanded such relief on the same set of facts in a complaint. By his prayer for both types of remedies, he has waived his right to a jury trial on the issues raised by the answer and the reply. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 424, 425; DiMenna v. Cooper & Evans Co., 220 N. Y. 391, 396.) All concur. (The order denies a motion by defendant Wallace for a jury trial of issues of fact in an action to foreclose a mortgage.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liberty Bank of Buffalo v. Lansing, 259 A.D. 797, 18 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 797 (Liberty Bank of Buffalo v. Lansing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sue v. Homer
15 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Kutun v. Kranz
274 A.D. 365 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)