Liberoff v. Liberoff

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Liberoff v. Liberoff

673 So. 2d 193, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5129, 1996 WL 253282

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 15, 1996

DocketNo. 95-3356

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 673 So. 2d 193 (Liberoff v. Liberoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liberoff v. Liberoff, 673 So. 2d 193, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5129, 1996 WL 253282 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are compelled to reverse the trial court’s dismissal of the third amended complaint with prejudice where we find the well pled allegations contained in the four corners [194]*194of the complaint to be legally sufficient to state a cause of action for breach of contract. E.g., De Ribeaux v. Del Valle, 531 So.2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are compelled to reverse the trial court’s dismissal of the third amended complaint with prejudice where we find the well pled allegations contained in the four corners [194]*194of the complaint to be legally sufficient to state a cause of action for breach of contract. E.g., De Ribeaux v. Del Valle, 531 So.2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

673 So. 2d 193, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5129, 1996 WL 253282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberoff-v-liberoff-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack