Liberoff v. Liberoff
673 So. 2d 193, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5129, 1996 WL 253282
Opinion
We are compelled to reverse the trial court’s dismissal of the third amended complaint with prejudice where we find the well pled allegations contained in the four corners [194]*194of the complaint to be legally sufficient to state a cause of action for breach of contract. E.g., De Ribeaux v. Del Valle, 531 So.2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Liberoff v. Liberoff, 673 So. 2d 193, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5129, 1996 WL 253282 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
673 So. 2d 193 (Liberoff v. Liberoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Liberoff v. Liberoff
711 So. 2d 1333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)