Liberman v. Zeigen

258 A.D. 893, 16 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7471
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 4, 1939·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Action for money had and received. Defendants moved [894]*894under rule 107, subdivision 6, of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the cause of action did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action thereon. The motion was granted as to the defendant Bessie Zeigen but denied as to the defendant Samuel L. Zeigen, and the latter appeals. In our opinion the issues raised by appellant cannot be determined upon affidavits but must await the trial. Resettled order, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liberman v. Zeigen, 258 A.D. 893, 16 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7471 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

258 A.D. 893 (Liberman v. Zeigen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaad v. Hutchinson's Boat Works, Inc.
40 A.D.2d 757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)