Liberman v. Liberman

240 A.D. 768

This text of 240 A.D. 768 (Liberman v. Liberman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liberman v. Liberman, 240 A.D. 768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff’s proposed findings numbered 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, found by the Special Term, are reversed as being inconsistent with the decision; defendant’s proposed findings numbered 4, 5, 7 and 8, in so far as they were denied, are found; and this court makes the following new finding: “ For nearly two years, and with full knowledge of the alleged fraud that she invokes, the plaintiff accepted benefits under the contract of marriage which she now seeks to annul.” It is not necessary to decide whether or not failure of one spouse to accord “ marital rights ” to the other, where there is no impotence, [769]*769may be the subject of an action for affirmative relief. (Mirizio v. Mirizio, 242 N. Y. 74, 80.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mirizio v. Mirizio
150 N.E. 605 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberman-v-liberman-nyappdiv-1933.