Liberal Finance Co. v. Lempert

Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas

Liberal Finance Co. v. Lempert

14 Pa. D. & C. 724, 1930 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 279

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

DecidedDecember 24, 1930

DocketNo. 7430

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Pa. D. & C. 724 (Liberal Finance Co. v. Lempert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liberal Finance Co. v. Lempert, 14 Pa. D. & C. 724, 1930 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 279 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Alessandroni, J.,

Judgment was obtained against Hyman Lempert, upon which execution was issued. The sheriff levied against certain property, and the defendant’s wife, Bertha Lempert, filed a property claim. The sheriff’s rule for interpleader was made absolute and Bertha Lempert filed a petition for leave to file her own bond. The petition avers that Bertha Lempert is in possession of the property levied upon and derived title to it by purchase from her own funds and that she did not derive title to those goods through her husband, Hyman Lempert, nor has he any interest therein. No answer was filed to the petition, and it appearing clearly from the pleadings that the petitioner was in possession of the goods which had been purchased with her own funds, she is entitled, by virtue of the Act of May 26, 1897, P. L. 95, to file her own bond: Blumenthal v. Rosenblatt, 5 D. & C. 763; Hochman v. Carroll, 19 Dist. R. 243.

And now, to wit, Dec. 24, 1930, claimant’s rule for’leave to file her own bond is made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alessandroni, J.,

Judgment was obtained against Hyman Lempert, upon which execution was issued. The sheriff levied against certain property, and the defendant’s wife, Bertha Lempert, filed a property claim. The sheriff’s rule for interpleader was made absolute and Bertha Lempert filed a petition for leave to file her own bond. The petition avers that Bertha Lempert is in possession of the property levied upon and derived title to it by purchase from her own funds and that she did not derive title to those goods through her husband, Hyman Lempert, nor has he any interest therein. No answer was filed to the petition, and it appearing clearly from the pleadings that the petitioner was in possession of the goods which had been purchased with her own funds, she is entitled, by virtue of the Act of May 26, 1897, P. L. 95, to file her own bond: Blumenthal v. Rosenblatt, 5 D. & C. 763; Hochman v. Carroll, 19 Dist. R. 243.

And now, to wit, Dec. 24, 1930, claimant’s rule for’leave to file her own bond is made absolute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Pa. D. & C. 724, 1930 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberal-finance-co-v-lempert-pactcomplphilad-1930.