Libby v. Comm'r

1969 T.C. Memo. 184, 28 T.C.M. 915, 1969 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 113
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedSeptember 8, 1969
DocketDocket No. 1357-68.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1969 T.C. Memo. 184 (Libby v. Comm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Libby v. Comm'r, 1969 T.C. Memo. 184, 28 T.C.M. 915, 1969 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 113 (tax 1969).

Opinion

Louis B. Libby and Virginia Libby v. Commissioner.
Libby v. Comm'r
Docket No. 1357-68.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1969-184; 1969 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 113; 28 T.C.M. (CCH) 915; T.C.M. (RIA) 69184;
September 8, 1969, Filed
Vincent F. Kilborn, 154 St. Louis St., P.O. Box 2565, Mobile, Ala., for the petitioners. Robert W. Goodman, for the respondent.

DAWSON
*113

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

DAWSON, Judge: Respondent determined the following income tax deficiencies and additions to tax against the petitioners:

YearDeficiencyAddition to TaxSec. 6653(b) 1
1959$ 98.43$ 49.21
19602,768.321,384.16
19613,374.131,687.06
19627,153.443,576.72
19634,177.012,088.50
19641,849.97924.98
*114

The issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioners understated their taxable income for the years 1959 through 1964 resulting in deficiencies in their Federal income taxes for those years; (2) whether any part of the underpayment for each of the years 1959 through 1964 was due to fraud with intent to evade tax; and (3) whether the assessment of any deficiencies for the years 1959 and 1960 is barred by the statute of limitations.

Findings of Fact

Some of the facts have been stipulated. The stipulation of facts and exhibits attached thereto are incorporated herein by this reference.

Louis B. Libby and Virginia Whatley Burnette Libby (herein called petitioners) are husband and wife whose legal residence was Saraland, Alabama, at the time they filed their petition in this case. Petitioners filed their joint Federal income tax returns for the years 1959 through 1964 with the district director of internal revenue at Birmingham, Alabama.

Virginia Libby (herein referred to as Virginia) filed Federal income tax returns for the years 1963 and 1964 in the name of her minor son, Danny*115 Ray Burnette, which she signed as his legal custodian.

Hazel Hamm Whatley, the mother of Virginia, married Randolph D. Whatley, by whom she had three children before 1932. Their daughter, Mary, born in 1930, was afflicted and remains so.

In 1932 the Whatleys moved to Prattville, Alabama, where Randolph worked on the plantation of a cattle raiser, Grover Cleveland Passmore. The Whatleys lived in a tenant house on Passmore's land. Passmore was married but childless. Virginia was born in Passmore's plantation house 916 near Prattville, Alabama, on March 30, 1934, legally the daughter of Randolph and Hazel Whatley. 2 She was known as Virginia Whatley. Over the years there was a close relationship, affection or friendship between Passmore and Virginia which lasted until his death on December 3, 1964, at the age of 79. 3 He gave some money to Virginia prior to and during the years 1960 through 1964.

*116 In 1948, Virginia married James Bond, an itinerant construction worker. They lived in several places until they were divorced in 1952. In that year Virginia, James and her mother and sister Mary moved to Saraland, Alabama, a town immediately north of Mobile.

In 1954, Virginia married Oscar Lamar Burnette. They had one son, Danny Ray Burnette, who was born December 20, 1954. Lamar Burnette was a roofer while he and Virginia were married. They lived in several places from 1954 until they were divorced in 1958, namely, New Orleans, Montgomery, Saraland and Goldsboro, North Carolina. From time to time after their divorce and during the years 1959 through 1964, Burnette sent Virginia various sums of money (he was ordered to pay $15 per week) for the support of his son, Danny Ray Burnette. The amounts he sent averaged about $300 per year.

On September 30, 1959, Virginia married Louis Libby, who was employed by the Lone Star Cement Company as an engineer on a tugboat.

About a year after Virginia married Louis Libby she became acquainted with Joseph A. Hoehn, a married man with grown children, and soon became his mistress. Virginia's mother, Hazel Whatley, knew of her extramarital*117 liaison with Hoehn. Soon after their relationship began, Hoehn made a steady practice of giving Virginia cash and checks. Louis Libby was apparently unaware of the relationship between Hoehn and Virginia. Hoehn was a businessman who operated the Hoehn Trading Center near Atmore, Alabama. He had personal accounts in the First National Bank of Atmore and the Bank of Atmore, and a corporate account in the name of Hoehn Trading Center in the Bank of Atmore. His wife found out about some of the checks he had given to Virginia and, in 1964, in an effort to conceal some of the payments, he persuaded Virginia to open an account in the name of "Dixie Premium Company," a nonexistent entity. Hoehn then caused checks made payable to Dixie Premium Company to be drawn on the Hoehn Trading Center account and delivered such checks to Virginia. She, in turn, cashed and deposited the money in various savings accounts mentioned later herein. In each of the years 1961 through 1964 Hoehn gave Virginia approximately $3,000. He also bought her an automobile in 1962 and later bought her a second automobile, which cost about $3,600. He arranged for Virginia to finance its purchase through the C.I.T.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corliss v. Bowers
281 U.S. 376 (Supreme Court, 1930)
Holland v. United States
348 U.S. 121 (Supreme Court, 1955)
David Pleason v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
226 F.2d 732 (Seventh Circuit, 1955)
Condor Merritt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
301 F.2d 484 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
Howell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
175 F.2d 240 (Sixth Circuit, 1949)
Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
39 F.2d 540 (Second Circuit, 1930)
Arthur v. Arthur
77 So. 2d 477 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Franks v. State
161 So. 549 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1935)
Howell v. Commissioner
10 T.C. 859 (U.S. Tax Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1969 T.C. Memo. 184, 28 T.C.M. 915, 1969 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/libby-v-commr-tax-1969.