Lian Bros. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Lian Bros. v. United States

21 Cust. Ct. 253, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 803

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 8, 1948

DocketNo. 52718; protest 131828-K (B) (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Cust. Ct. 253 (Lian Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lian Bros. v. United States, 21 Cust. Ct. 253, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 803 (cusc 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that duty was paid by the importer on 132 packages supposedly contained in case No. 859; that at the time of its unloading, case 859 was examined by the inspector; that it was found by him to have been landed in bad order and to contain only 95 packages. In accordance with stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact it was held that all duty taken upon the merchandise contained in said 37 missing packages should be refunded. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that duty was paid by the importer on 132 packages supposedly contained in case No. 859; that at the time of its unloading, case 859 was examined by the inspector; that it was found by him to have been landed in bad order and to contain only 95 packages. In accordance with stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact it was held that all duty taken upon the merchandise contained in said 37 missing packages should be refunded. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Cust. Ct. 253, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lian-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1948.