Liamero v. Herbert Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Liamero v. Herbert Construction Co.

288 A.D.2d 4, 732 N.Y.S.2d 156, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10198

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 1, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 288 A.D.2d 4 (Liamero v. Herbert Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liamero v. Herbert Construction Co., 288 A.D.2d 4, 732 N.Y.S.2d 156, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10198 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J., and a jury), entered June 14, 2000, in favor of plaintiff laborer and against defendant general contractor in the amount of $533,994.72, inclusive of interest, costs and disbursements, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The trial court properly denied defendant’s request for a missing witness charge on the ground that the testimony would have been cumulative (see, Dowling v 257 Assocs., 235 AD2d [5]*5293). The jury’s award of $428,442 for lost wages was properly based on, inter alia, the testimony of an official of plaintiffs union as to the number of hours plaintiff had worked in years preceding the accident. We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J., and a jury), entered June 14, 2000, in favor of plaintiff laborer and against defendant general contractor in the amount of $533,994.72, inclusive of interest, costs and disbursements, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The trial court properly denied defendant’s request for a missing witness charge on the ground that the testimony would have been cumulative (see, Dowling v 257 Assocs., 235 AD2d [5]*5293). The jury’s award of $428,442 for lost wages was properly based on, inter alia, the testimony of an official of plaintiffs union as to the number of hours plaintiff had worked in years preceding the accident. We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 A.D.2d 4, 732 N.Y.S.2d 156, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liamero-v-herbert-construction-co-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack