Liahben v. Osteen

358 F. App'x 394
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2009·No. No. 09-7360·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clifford Liahben appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismiss[395] ing as frivolous Liahben’s action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the civil RICO statute.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Liahben v. Osteen, No. 1:09-cv-00226-NCT-PTS (M.D.N.C. June 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liahben v. Osteen, 358 F. App'x 394 (4th Cir. 2009).

358 F. App'x 394 (Liahben v. Osteen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related