Li v. Woo Sung Yun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Li v. Woo Sung Yun

1 A.D.2d 410, 767 N.Y.S.2d 383

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Li v. Woo Sung Yun. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 A.D.3d 624 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 2003·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Kuen Tak Wong and Wai Lin Cheung appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cohen-Aronin, J.), dated September 3, 2002, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Goldstein, J.E, Adams, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Kuen Tak Wong and Wai Lin Cheung appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cohen-Aronin, J.), dated September 3, 2002, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Goldstein, J.E, Adams, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Li v. Woo Sung Yun, 1 A.D.2d 410, 767 N.Y.S.2d 383 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

1 A.D.2d 410 (Li v. Woo Sung Yun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.