Li v. Ho
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 24-JUL-2026 07:51 AM Dkt. 6 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
ZHAO KANG LI, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE TIMOTHY E. HO, Judge of the District Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaii, Respondent Judge,
and
HONOLULU FORD, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (1DSC-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Soong, assigned by reason of vacancy)
On June 2, 2026, Petitioner Zhao Kang Li filed a petition
for a writ of mandamus, alleging in pertinent part that he
obtained a writ of execution on a judgment entered in his favor
but has been unable to enforce it. Li contends that the
sheriffs and police refused to assist in executing the writ. We conclude that Petitioner failed to establish a clear and
indisputable right to the relief requested, and a lack of other
means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the
requested action. Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153
Hawaii 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).
A civil process server is authorized by law to serve and
execute a writ of execution issued pursuant to HRS Chapter 651.
See Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 353C-11(a)(6) (Supp. 2021);
HRS § 651-1(d) (Supp. 2022) (defining “police officer” as used
in Chapter 651, “Attachment and Execution,” to include “an
independent civil process server on the list maintained by the
department of law enforcement pursuant to section 353C-11.”).
The Department of Law Enforcement maintains a “Process Service
List” on its website: https://law.hawaii.gov/resources/private-
process-servers/ [https://perma.cc/AKE8-3HGZ].
Petitioner also has alternative post-judgment remedies,
including garnishment. See HRS Chapter 652.
We note that Petitioner is self-represented. In striking
Petitioner’s request, the district court directed Petitioner to
seek legal advice. Among the resources available to assist
self-represented litigants, the district court may provide
contact information for the District Court Access to Justice
Rooms and Self-Help Centers, where Petitioner may schedule an
appointment with a volunteer attorney to discuss his case. The
2 contact information is posted on the Judiciary's website:
https://www.courts.state.hi.us/general_information/access_to_jus
tice_rooms_self_help_centers [https://perma.cc/RM2A-LM8S]. In
addition, for assistance completing forms, Petitioner may
contact the District Court Service Center at Kauikeaouli Hale,
1111 Alakea Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, Ph. 808-538-5629.
It is ordered:
1. The petition is denied.
2. The appellate clerk shall process the petition without
payment of the filing fee, and the filing fees collected in this
proceeding shall be refunded.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 24, 2026.
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Michael K. Soong
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Li v. Ho (Li v. Ho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.