Li v. Gonzales

Fifth Circuit

Li v. Gonzales

429 F.3d 1153

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 2, 2005·No. 03-60670·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Xiaodong Li initially petitioned this court for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reversing the Immigration Judge’s decision granting Li withholding of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. This court affirmed the decision of the BIA and Li timely filed a petition for rehearing, which has not been ruled on; however, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) petitioned the BIA to reopen the removal proceedings against Li based on new evidence and to permit the DHS to withdraw its appeal. On October 6, 2005, the BIA granted the DHS’s motion, vacated its decision, and reinstated the Immigration Judges’s February 28, 2000 decision granting Li withholding of removal. Li subsequently filed a motion to vacate the panel’s decision.

Accordingly, Li’s motion to vacate is GRANTED, the previous opinion of this panel published at 420 F.3d 500 (5th Cir.2005) is VACATED and Li’s petition for review and his petition for rehearing are DISMISSED as moot. See Discipio v. Ashcroft, 417 F.3d 448, 450 (5th Cir.2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Xiaodong Li initially petitioned this court for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reversing the Immigration Judge’s decision granting Li withholding of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. This court affirmed the decision of the BIA and Li timely filed a petition for rehearing, which has not been ruled on; however, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) petitioned the BIA to reopen the removal proceedings against Li based on new evidence and to permit the DHS to withdraw its appeal. On October 6, 2005, the BIA granted the DHS’s motion, vacated its decision, and reinstated the Immigration Judges’s February 28, 2000 decision granting Li withholding of removal. Li subsequently filed a motion to vacate the panel’s decision.

Accordingly, Li’s motion to vacate is GRANTED, the previous opinion of this panel published at 420 F.3d 500 (5th Cir.2005) is VACATED and Li’s petition for review and his petition for rehearing are DISMISSED as moot. See Discipio v. Ashcroft, 417 F.3d 448, 450 (5th Cir.2005).

Li v. Gonzales, 429 F.3d 1153 (5th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

429 F.3d 1153 (Li v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related