Li Bassi v. Li Bassi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Li Bassi v. Li Bassi

42 A.D.2d 960, 347 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3487

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 960 (Li Bassi v. Li Bassi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Li Bassi v. Li Bassi, 42 A.D.2d 960, 347 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alla to adjudge deeds to real property void and for partition and an accounting, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated June 13, 1973, as granted plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s jury demand and denied defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. This determination is without prejudice to the right of defendant, if so advised, to apply for a jury trial of the issues of partition, if plaintiff should prevail on her equitable causes of action to set aside the transfer of the subject property (see Gifford v. Whittemore, 4 A D 2d 379, 383). Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alla to adjudge deeds to real property void and for partition and an accounting, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated June 13, 1973, as granted plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s jury demand and denied defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. This determination is without prejudice to the right of defendant, if so advised, to apply for a jury trial of the issues of partition, if plaintiff should prevail on her equitable causes of action to set aside the transfer of the subject property (see Gifford v. Whittemore, 4 A D 2d 379, 383). Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 960, 347 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/li-bassi-v-li-bassi-nyappdiv-1973.