L'Heureux v. Pine

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided November 13, 1998·No. 98-1333·Unpublished

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 98-1333

RONALD L'HEUREUX,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFREY J. PINE, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

[Hon. Ernest C. Torres, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Selya, Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

Ronald L'Heureux on brief pro se. Aaron L. Weisman on brief for respondent.

November 10, 1998

Per Curiam. After careful review of the briefs and record, and in light of the pending state court proceedings, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the petition for lack of exhaustion. 28 U.S.C. 2254(b)(1); seeJohnson v. Moran, 812 F.2d 23, 23 (1st Cir. 1987); Layne v. Gunter, 559 F.2d 850, 851-52 (1st Cir. 1977). Petitioner's remaining arguments and requests are not properly before this court. Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L'Heureux v. Pine, (1st Cir. 1998).

L'Heureux v. Pine (L'Heureux v. Pine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert M. Layne v. Frank O. Gunter
559 F.2d 850 (First Circuit, 1977)
Paul C. Johnson v. John Moran
812 F.2d 23 (First Circuit, 1987)