L'Heureux v. Pine
This text of L'Heureux v. Pine (L'Heureux v. Pine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 98-1333
RONALD L'HEUREUX,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFREY J. PINE, ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Ernest C. Torres, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
Ronald L'Heureux on brief pro se. Aaron L. Weisman on brief for respondent.
November 10, 1998
Per Curiam. After careful review of the briefs and record, and in light of the pending state court proceedings, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the petition for lack of exhaustion. 28 U.S.C. 2254(b)(1); seeJohnson v. Moran, 812 F.2d 23, 23 (1st Cir. 1987); Layne v. Gunter, 559 F.2d 850, 851-52 (1st Cir. 1977). Petitioner's remaining arguments and requests are not properly before this court. Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
L'Heureux v. Pine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lheureux-v-pine-ca1-1998.