L.G. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

L.G. v. State

813 So. 2d 1077, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5210, 2002 WL 662890

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 24, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-452

StatusPublished

This text of 813 So. 2d 1077 (L.G. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L.G. v. State, 813 So. 2d 1077, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5210, 2002 WL 662890 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

FARMER, J.

We affirm L.G.’s conviction for grand theft. We disagree with defendant that the record fails to prove the value of the goods stolen. While it is true that no witness stated the total value, as such, of the stolen video games and equipment, there was evidence that six games at $50 each, and a $59.99 game shark, were stolen. We therefore conclude that the evidence was sufficient for the trier of fact to find a value of stolen goods in excess of $300.

We do remand, however, for the trial court to correct the disposition order to reflect an adjudication of delinquency after trial rather than by a plea.

HAZOURI, J, and DELL, JOHN W., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FARMER, J.

We affirm L.G.’s conviction for grand theft. We disagree with defendant that the record fails to prove the value of the goods stolen. While it is true that no witness stated the total value, as such, of the stolen video games and equipment, there was evidence that six games at $50 each, and a $59.99 game shark, were stolen. We therefore conclude that the evidence was sufficient for the trier of fact to find a value of stolen goods in excess of $300.

We do remand, however, for the trial court to correct the disposition order to reflect an adjudication of delinquency after trial rather than by a plea.

HAZOURI, J, and DELL, JOHN W., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

813 So. 2d 1077, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5210, 2002 WL 662890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lg-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.