Lezensky v. Supreme Lodge of Knights of Honor

14 N.Y.S. 138
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedJune 15, 1890
StatusPublished

This text of 14 N.Y.S. 138 (Lezensky v. Supreme Lodge of Knights of Honor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lezensky v. Supreme Lodge of Knights of Honor, 14 N.Y.S. 138 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Opinion

McAdam, C. J.

An appeal be taken to the court of common from “an order” made by the general term of the city court granting a new trial. No formal judgment need be entered, the order being in the nature of [139]*139a final determination. Code Civil Proc. § 3191; Bamberg v. Stern, 76 N. Y. 555. The costs awarded were “to abide the event,” so that there is nothing for which a judgment can be entered. The case is unlike Whitfield v. Railroad Co., 10 N. Y. Supp. 106, wherein a judgment for the plaintiff was affirmed, with costs, and a new judgment for costs was entered on the order of the general term. There the order was preliminary to the final judgment subsequently entered, and the defendant erroneously appealed from the order instead of the judgment. ■ Motion to compel plaintiff to enter judgment on the order of reversal denied, without costs. ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bamberg v. . Stern
76 N.Y. 555 (New York Court of Appeals, 1879)
Whitfield v. Broadway & Seventh Avenue Railroad
10 N.Y.S. 106 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 N.Y.S. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lezensky-v-supreme-lodge-of-knights-of-honor-nynyccityct-1890.