Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Lezell v. Hiller, Inc.

Lezell v. Hiller, Inc.

721 N.W.2d 175
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 20, 2006
Docket130943
StatusPublished

This text of 721 N.W.2d 175 (Lezell v. Hiller, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lezell v. Hiller, Inc., 721 N.W.2d 175 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

721 N.W.2d 175 (2006)

Charlene Beth LEZELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HILLER, INC., and Orchard Mall, LLC,[1] Defendants-Appellees.

Docket Nos. 130943, 130944. COA Nos. 256415, 257384.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 20, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

NOTES

[1] The Court of Appeals caption incorrectly identified the second defendant as "Oakland Mall, LLC" instead of "Orchard Mall, LLC." The caption has been corrected here.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
721 N.W.2d 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lezell-v-hiller-inc-mich-2006.