Lezell v. Hiller, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Lezell v. Hiller, Inc.

721 N.W.2d 175

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 20, 2006·No. 130943·Published

Opinion

721 N.W.2d 175 (2006)

Charlene Beth LEZELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HILLER, INC., and Orchard Mall, LLC,^[1] Defendants-Appellees.

Docket Nos. 130943, 130944. COA Nos. 256415, 257384.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 20, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

NOTES

[1] The Court of Appeals caption incorrectly identified the second defendant as "Oakland Mall, LLC" instead of "Orchard Mall, LLC." The caption has been corrected here.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

721 N.W.2d 175 (2006)

Charlene Beth LEZELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HILLER, INC., and Orchard Mall, LLC,^[1] Defendants-Appellees.

Docket Nos. 130943, 130944. COA Nos. 256415, 257384.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 20, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

NOTES

[1] The Court of Appeals caption incorrectly identified the second defendant as "Oakland Mall, LLC" instead of "Orchard Mall, LLC." The caption has been corrected here.

Lezell v. Hiller, Inc., 721 N.W.2d 175 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

721 N.W.2d 175 (Lezell v. Hiller, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Charlene Beth LEZELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HILLER, INC., and Orchard Mall, LLC,[1] Defendants-Appellees.

NOTES

Charlene Beth LEZELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HILLER, INC., and Orchard Mall, LLC,^[1] Defendants-Appellees.