Lezama Garcia v. Field Office Director for Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided July 25, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-00630·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION WILFREDO ALBERTO LEZAMA GARCIA, Petitioner, v. Case No. 2:25-cv-630-JLB-KCD FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR for MIAMI FIELD OFFICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION and CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, et al., Respondents.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL Before the Court is Petitioner Wilfredo Alberto Lezama Garcia’s “Notice of Voluntary Dismissal.” (Doc. 8.) Rule 41(a)(1)(A)G) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to voluntarily dismiss an action before the opposing party serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. The dismissal is effective upon filing and requires no further act by the Court. See Matthews v. Gaither, 902 F.2d 877, 880 (11th Cir. 1990) (per curiam); Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1278 (11th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to deny all pending motions as moot, terminate all deadlines, and close the case. DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on July 25, 2025.

JOHN L. BADALAMENTI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lezama Garcia v. Field Office Director for Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, (M.D. Fla. 2025).

Lezama Garcia v. Field Office Director for Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Lezama Garcia v. Field Office Director for Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roland Markland Matthews v. Barry K. Gaither
902 F.2d 877 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)
Anago Franchising, Inc. v. SHAZ, LLC
677 F.3d 1272 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)