Leza, Armando

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 16, 2015
DocketWR-81,580-01
StatusPublished

This text of Leza, Armando (Leza, Armando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leza, Armando, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-81,580-01

EX PARTE ARMANDO LEZA

ON APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE NO. 2007-CR-4563A IN THE 187 TH DISTRICT COURT BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

In May 2009, a jury found applicant guilty of the offense of capital murder. The jury

answered the statutory punishment questions in such a way that the trial court set applicant’s

punishment at death. On December 17, 2010, the State filed in this Court its brief on

applicant’s direct appeal. Pursuant to Article 11.071 §§ 4(a) and (b)1 , applicant’s initial

1 Unless otherwise indicated all references to Articles refer to the Code of Criminal Procedure. Leza - 2

application for a writ of habeas corpus was due to be filed in the trial court on or before May

2, 2011, assuming a motion for extension was timely filed and granted.

Because it had been more than three years since the application was due in the trial

court, this Court on June 18, 2014, ordered the trial court to resolve any remaining issues in

the case within 120 days from the date of that order. This Court further noted that the clerk

should immediately thereafter transmit the complete writ record to this Court. Thus, the trial

court should have resolved the issues raised in the writ on or before October 16, 2014, and

the record should have been sent to this Court shortly thereafter. However, no writ record

has been sent to this Court.

It has now been four and a half years since the application was due in the trial court.

Accordingly, the trial court has 60 days to resolve any issues remaining in the case. The

clerk should immediately thereafter transmit the complete writ record to this Court. Any

extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015.

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Leza, Armando, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leza-armando-texcrimapp-2015.