Leyva v. Trujillo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leyva v. Trujillo

26 So. 3d 664, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 528, 2010 WL 289191

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 27, 2010

Docket3D08-2090

StatusPublished

This text of 26 So. 3d 664 (Leyva v. Trujillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leyva v. Trujillo, 26 So. 3d 664, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 528, 2010 WL 289191 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ROTHENBERG, J.

In this automobile negligence action, the plaintiffs, Uberlando Leyva and Alicia Llanes, appeal the denial of their motion for new trial which asserted that the jury’s verdict of no liability on the part of the defendants, Salvador Trujillo and Enterprise Leasing Company, is against the manifest weight of the evidence. As the evidence adduced at trial was conflicting, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial. See Weatherly v. Louis, — So.3d -(Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Rosario-Paredes v. J.C. Wrecker Sen., 975 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

The remaining issue raised by the plaintiffs lacks merit. Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROTHENBERG, J.

In this automobile negligence action, the plaintiffs, Uberlando Leyva and Alicia Llanes, appeal the denial of their motion for new trial which asserted that the jury’s verdict of no liability on the part of the defendants, Salvador Trujillo and Enterprise Leasing Company, is against the manifest weight of the evidence. As the evidence adduced at trial was conflicting, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial. See Weatherly v. Louis, — So.3d -(Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Rosario-Paredes v. J.C. Wrecker Sen., 975 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

The remaining issue raised by the plaintiffs lacks merit. Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 So. 3d 664, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 528, 2010 WL 289191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leyva-v-trujillo-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack