Home/New York Court of Appeals/Leyva v. Levy

Leyva v. Levy

507 N.E.2d 311, 69 N.Y.2d 847, 514 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 15896
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 19, 1987·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with costs to the City of New York against the appellants. There was testimony by the police officers who witnessed the entry of the Richardson vehicle that the vehicle entered the properly marked Van Cortlandt Park South ramp, and "there is simply no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational [jurors] to the [contrary] conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented at trial” (Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499).

[850] Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leyva v. Levy, 507 N.E.2d 311, 69 N.Y.2d 847, 514 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 15896 (N.Y. 1987).

507 N.E.2d 311 (Leyva v. Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shante D. v. City of New York
190 A.D.2d 356 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Randolph v. City of New York
507 N.E.2d 298 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)