Leysath v. Leysath

125 S.E. 737, 130 S.C. 511, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 100
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 31, 1924·No. 11638·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This was an action brought September 10, 1923, by Leita Eeysath for alimony in the sum of $200.00 per month, and suit money in the sum of $300.00. The case was heard by his Honor, T. S. Sease, presiding Judge, at the October, 1923, term of the Court of Common Pleas for Orangeburg County upon the verified petition and affidavits of the plaintiff and affidavits submitted by the defendant, who made his decree allowing $100.00 per month temporary alimony and $200.00 suit money, and enjoined the defendant, appellant, from disposing of any of his property until the termination of the action.”

The exceptions, four in number, challenge the correctness of Judge Sease’s finding and holding.

As this is a temporary alimony case, until the case is tried on its merits, we overrule all the exceptions and affirm the decree of Judge Sease, under Nicholson v. Nicholson, 115 S. C., 326; 105 S. E., 700. Wise v. Wise, 119 S. C., 10; 111 S. E., 792. Cleveland v. Cleveland (S. C.), 122 S. E., 500. Molloy v. Molloy, 107 S. C., 99; 91 S. E., 971. *513 Sadler v. Sadler, 115 S. C., 217; 105 S. E., 285. O’Neal v. O’Neal (S. C.), 123 S. E., 206.

Judgment affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Fraser, Cothran and Marion concur. Mr. Chief Justice Gary did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leysath v. Leysath, 125 S.E. 737, 130 S.C. 511, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 100 (S.C. 1924).

125 S.E. 737 (Leysath v. Leysath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lynch v. Lynch
136 S.E. 25 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)