Leyden v. Lawrence
85 A. 1134, 80 N.J. Eq. 550, 10 Buchanan 550, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 363
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in tire opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chiee-Justicb, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Bergen, Voorhbes, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Treacy —14.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leyden v. Lawrence, 85 A. 1134, 80 N.J. Eq. 550, 10 Buchanan 550, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 363 (N.J. 1912).
85 A. 1134 (Leyden v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bd. of Ed., Woodbridge Tp. v. Kane Acoustical Co.
143 A.2d 853 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Di Giovacchini v. Teich
30 A.2d 815 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)