Leydecker v. United States

97 Ct. Cl. 711, 1942 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 19, 1942 WL 4338
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedDecember 7, 1942
DocketNo. 45299
StatusPublished

This text of 97 Ct. Cl. 711 (Leydecker v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leydecker v. United States, 97 Ct. Cl. 711, 1942 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 19, 1942 WL 4338 (cc 1942).

Opinion

[713]*713The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover in an opinion fer curiam, as follows:

The defendant does not deny plaintiff’s mother was solely dependent upon him for support. It is clear that she was. Accordingly, plaintiff is entitled to the additional allowance for a dependent, as provided for by law. See Barnes v. United States, 95 C. Cls. 411; Ficklen v. United States, 95 C. Cls. 531; Van Auken v. United States, No. 44646, decided by this court November 2, 1942.

Entry of judgment will be suspended until the incoming of a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due computed in accordance with the foregoing findings and this opinion. It is so ordered.

In accordance with the above opinion and upon a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due thereunder to be $1,119.53, and upon plaintiff’s motion for judgment, it was ordered April 5,1943, that judgment for the plaintiff be entered in the sum of $1,119.53.

Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the above judgment and to obtain further information from the General Accounting Office was overruled April 28,1943.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnes v. United States
95 Ct. Cl. 411 (Court of Claims, 1942)
Ficklen v. United States
95 Ct. Cl. 531 (Court of Claims, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 Ct. Cl. 711, 1942 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 19, 1942 WL 4338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leydecker-v-united-states-cc-1942.