Home/Third Circuit/Leyda Hernandez v. The Hertz Corporation, Defendant-Third Party v. Alejandro Hernandez, Third Party

Leyda Hernandez v. The Hertz Corporation, Defendant-Third Party v. Alejandro Hernandez, Third Party

867 F.2d 1330, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3072, 1989 WL 15757
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMarch 15, 1989
Docket88-5415
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 867 F.2d 1330 (Leyda Hernandez v. The Hertz Corporation, Defendant-Third Party v. Alejandro Hernandez, Third Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leyda Hernandez v. The Hertz Corporation, Defendant-Third Party v. Alejandro Hernandez, Third Party, 867 F.2d 1330, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3072, 1989 WL 15757 (3d Cir. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appeal in this case is patently frivolous; moreover, the appellant knew that the appeal was frivolous when it was filed. The appeal is dismissed. On receipt of our mandate, the district court shall award the appellee any damages caused by the appeal, including a reasonable attorney’s fee. The appellee is also awarded double costs. See Fed.R.App.P. 38; Collins v. Amoco Production Company, 706 F.2d 1114 (11th Cir.1983).

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James A. Bonfiglio v. Charles Nugent, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Roth, Romano, Eriksen & Kupfer, P.A.
986 F.2d 1391 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
867 F.2d 1330, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3072, 1989 WL 15757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leyda-hernandez-v-the-hertz-corporation-defendant-third-party-v-ca3-1989.