Leyba v. State

520 So. 2d 705, 1988 WL 16017
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 3, 1988
Docket87-1367
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 520 So. 2d 705 (Leyba v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leyba v. State, 520 So. 2d 705, 1988 WL 16017 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

520 So.2d 705 (1988)

Jorge L. LEYBA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1367.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 3, 1988.

*706 James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ellen D. Phillips, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence in a burglary case. The mandatory minimum sentence is applicable in a case where the defendant arms himself after committing a burglary. Williams v. State, 517 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1988), disapproving State v. Pilcher, 443 So.2d 366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

The sentencing judge ordered appellant to make restitution without first determining his ability to do so as required by Section 775.089(6), Florida Statutes (1985). See Pettway v. State, 502 So.2d 1353 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Gaskins v. State, 502 So.2d 1344 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Turner v. State, 431 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 4th DCA), dismissed 436 So.2d 101 (Fla. 1983). That portion of the sentence is vacated. We remand for a hearing to determine whether restitution is permitted under the statute. Because this portion of the sentence is vacated and a ramand is necessary we also vacate the portion of the sentence which requires the payment of court costs, even though no objection below was made, because it is clear that portion of the sentence may be affected by appellant's alleged indigency.

SENTENCE VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.

COWART and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duby v. State
651 So. 2d 800 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
McCoy v. State
632 So. 2d 181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Boss v. State
613 So. 2d 525 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Mallard v. State
609 So. 2d 178 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Butts v. State
575 So. 2d 1379 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Anderson v. State
556 So. 2d 527 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Singletary v. State
530 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 So. 2d 705, 1988 WL 16017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leyba-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.