Ley v. State

250 N.E.2d 878, 25 N.Y.2d 876

New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 2, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

25 N.Y.2d 876 (1969)

Edmund R. Ley, Appellant,
v.
State of New York, Respondent. (Claim No. 37269.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 29, 1969. Decided July 2, 1969.

Arthur D. Goldstein, Samuel Goldstein and M. Robert Goldstein for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Martin J. Siegel and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL and JASEN.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 N.Y.2d 876 (1969)

Edmund R. Ley, Appellant,
v.
State of New York, Respondent. (Claim No. 37269.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 29, 1969. Decided July 2, 1969.

Arthur D. Goldstein, Samuel Goldstein and M. Robert Goldstein for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Martin J. Siegel and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL and JASEN.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Ley v. State, 250 N.E.2d 878, 25 N.Y.2d 876 (N.Y. 1969).

Pincite

250 N.E.2d 878 (Ley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Generale Bank v. Bell Security, Inc.

21 A.D.3d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Rodolitz v. Boston-Old Colony Insurance

74 A.D.2d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)