Lexy Lee Hamilton v. The State of North Carolina and v. L. Bounds, Director of N.C. Prisons

Fourth Circuit

Lexy Lee Hamilton v. The State of North Carolina and v. L. Bounds, Director of N.C. Prisons

382 F.2d 296, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5226

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 29, 1967

Docket11044_1

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 382 F.2d 296 (Lexy Lee Hamilton v. The State of North Carolina and v. L. Bounds, Director of N.C. Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lexy Lee Hamilton v. The State of North Carolina and v. L. Bounds, Director of N.C. Prisons, 382 F.2d 296, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5226 (4th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lexy Lee Hamilton was indicted in Nash County, North Carolina, on three counts: (1) for breaking, entering and larceny, (2) for safebreaking, and (3) for *297 attempted safebreaking-. He was tried jointly with his two brothers before a jury and was convicted and sentenced on the first two counts. His conviction was affirmed by the North Carolina Supreme Court, 264 N.C. 277, 141 S.E.2d 506 (1965); and his petition for certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court, 384 U.S. 1020, 86 S.Ct. 1936, 16 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1966). He now appeals from the denial by the District Court of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus without a hearing. 1

Upon consideration of the District Court’s careful and analytical opinion, the record, the briefs and the argument of counsel, we find no reversible error and conclude that the judgment below must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. 260 F.Supp. 632 (E.D.N.C., 1966).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lexy Lee Hamilton was indicted in Nash County, North Carolina, on three counts: (1) for breaking, entering and larceny, (2) for safebreaking, and (3) for *297 attempted safebreaking-. He was tried jointly with his two brothers before a jury and was convicted and sentenced on the first two counts. His conviction was affirmed by the North Carolina Supreme Court, 264 N.C. 277, 141 S.E.2d 506 (1965); and his petition for certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court, 384 U.S. 1020, 86 S.Ct. 1936, 16 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1966). He now appeals from the denial by the District Court of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus without a hearing. 1

Upon consideration of the District Court’s careful and analytical opinion, the record, the briefs and the argument of counsel, we find no reversible error and conclude that the judgment below must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. 260 F.Supp. 632 (E.D.N.C., 1966).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

382 F.2d 296, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lexy-lee-hamilton-v-the-state-of-north-carolina-and-v-l-bounds-director-ca4-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack