Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 816 F.3d 721
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 28, 2016·No. 14-1617·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

March 28, 2016

ERRATUM ______________________

Appeal Nos. 2014-1617, 2014-1619 ______________________

LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant

QUALITY CARTRIDGES, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-20, BLUE TRADING LLC, EXPRINT INTERNATIONAL, INC., LD PRODUCTS, INC., PRINTRONIC CORPORATION, TESEN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) CO. LTD., BENIGNO ADEVA AND HIS COMPANIES, Defendants ______________________

Decided: February 12, 2016 Precedential Opinion ______________________

On page 19, line 13 of the opinion, “disjunction” has been changed to “disjunctive.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc. (Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.