Lexington & Eastern Railway Co. v. Sumner

245 S.W. 849, 196 Ky. 788, 1922 Ky. LEXIS 594
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedDecember 12, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 245 S.W. 849 (Lexington & Eastern Railway Co. v. Sumner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lexington & Eastern Railway Co. v. Sumner, 245 S.W. 849, 196 Ky. 788, 1922 Ky. LEXIS 594 (Ky. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay —

Affirming.

In -building a spur line along Rockhouse creek in Letcher county, the Lexington & Eastern Railway Company condemned a right of way 100 feet wide through a. 150 acre farm owned by John W. Sumner. In addition to taking á1/^ acres of bottom land and IV2 acres of hillside land, -an old house .and a number of .fruit trees were ' destroyed, and the Sumner residence, which immediately adjoined the right of way, was separated from the hot-[789]*789torn land. The commissioners fixed the damages at $4,055.00. The jury in the county court assessed the damages at $8,000.00. On appeal to the circuit court the jury awarded damages in the sum of $7,500.00. From that judgment the railroad company appeals.

It is insisted that the damages are excessive and were the result of prejudice and passion superinduced by a remark made by a stranger to the litigation.

The claim for damages included (1) land actually taken; (2) injury to the remainder of the tract on account of the situation in which it was left by the taking; (3) fruit trees destroyed; (4) the old house removed or destroyed; (5) necessary fencing; (6) inconvenience in getting from the residence to that portion of the farm cut off by the railroad right of way.

Of the witnesses who testified for the company, C. H. Back, the county clerk, fixed the market value of the bottom land at from $100.00 to $150.00 an acre. Dr. Ison fixed the value of the bottom land at from $300.00 to $500.00 an acre, and the hillside land at from $25.00 to $50.00 an acre, and the value of the whole farm before the taking at from $7,000.00 to $10,000.00, and after the taking at from $6,000.00 to $7,000.00. George S. Clark said that the whole farm before the taking was worth from $8,000.00 to $10,000.00, and was worth that much after the taking, and that the land taken was worth $200.00 or $300.00 an acre. J. W. Adams testified that the farm was worth before the taking at from $5,000.00 to $7,000.00, and after the taking $12,000.00; that the land taken was worth $3,000.00, and that $200.00 an acre was the market value of the entire strip. Wilbourn Hampton said that $500.00 an acre was a fair price for the land taken and that the bottom land was worth $500.00 and the hillside land $20.00 an acre. Joe Cundiff fixed the value of the bottom land at $200.00 an acre and the hillside land at $100.00 an acre. T. A. Dixon, one of the commissioners, fixed the bottom land at $500.00 an acre, and the hillside land at $50.00 an acre, and the value of the whole farm before the taking at $12,000.00, and after the taking at $10,000.00. He further testified that in assessing the whole damages at $4,055.00, the commissioners included the Sumner residence which, it was thought, would be taken, and valued it at $1,500.00. He also said that the old house which was destroyed was valued at $250.00 and that there were six or eight fruit-trees destroyed which were worth about $25.00 apiece, [790]*790and that the cost of the fencing was $250.00. W. H. Davis said that the bottom land was worth from _ $275.00 to $300.00 an acre, and that the value of the hillside land was very small, and that he valued the whole farm at from $275.00 to $300.00 an acre before the taking. Fess Whitaker, county judge, fixed the value of fhe land taken at $2,000.00, and first fixed the value of the whole farm -before the taking at $10,000.00, and its value after the taking at more than that. Upon being further examined by the court he said that the farm was worth $5,000.00 before the taking and $2,000.00 after the taking. He further said that the old house which was destroyed was worth about $50.00 and fixed the cost of the necessary fencing at $75.00. E. C. Holliday fixed the value of the bottom land at $250.00 an acre and the hillside land at from $25.00, to $30.00 an acre, and the value of the whole farm before the taking at $4,000.00 and after the taking at $3,000.00. He also testified that the old house was worth about $50.00, and .that there were about nineteen fruit trees destroyed which were worth about $75.00. Mr. Dudley testified that the bottom land was worth $150.00 an acre and the hillside land at from $10.00 to $25.00 an acre, and that the whole farm was worth more after the taking than it was before.

On the other hand Sumner fixed the value of the farm before the taking at $25,000.00, and after the taking at $10,000.00, and the value of the land taken at $1,000.00 an acre. He also said that about twenty apple trees, six or eight peach trees, ene pear tree, two mulberry trees and some' gooseberry bushes and grape vines were destroyed; that the apple trees were worth $25.00 each, the peach trees $5.00 each, and the other trees and vines $25.00. He further said that the old house destroyed was worth about $800.00 to $1,000.00, and that the fencing made necessary by the taking cost about $400.00. Riley Combs fixed the value of the whole farm before the taking at $20,000.00 and after the taking at one-half of that sum, or $10,000.00. He further fixed the value of the bottom land at $1,000.00 an acre and the value of the whole land at $500.'00 an acre. Will Dixon said that before the taking the farm was worth at from $18,000.00 to $20,000.00, and after the taking about $9,500.00. Alamander Whitaker fixed the value of the whole farm before the taking at $20,000.00, and its value after the taking at one-half that sum or $10,000.00. He further said that the strip taken was worth $10,000.00, considering [791]*791inconveniences and depreciation of the other part of the land. Wilboum Dixon said that before the taking- the farm was worth $20,000.00, and after the taking- $10,-000.00; that the ¡hillside land was worth from $400.00 to $500.00 an acre, and the bottom land $1,000.00 an acre. S. A. G-riffith also fixed the- value of the farm before the taking at $20,000.00 and after the taking at $10,000.00. Charlie Pratt said the farm before the taking was worth $17,000.00, and after the taking $10,000.00 less. Finley Sumner said the farm before the taking was worth $20,000.00, and and after the taking- one-half that much, or $10,000.00. Tom Watts said the farm before the taking was worth $20,000.00, and after the taking $10,000.00. Anee Cornett said the farm before the taking was worth $20,000.00, and after the taking $10,000.00.

The company also proved that the railroad was built in 1917, and that Sumner assessed his whole farm for that year at $3,000.00, and for the year 1918 at $5,280.00, and for the year 1919 at $4,780.00.

It is peculiarly -the province of the jury to assess damages in condemnation proceedings and we are not at liberty to set aside its finding where it is supported by substantial evidence. In the case of Sandy Valley & E. Ry. Co. v. Bentley, 161 Ky. 555, 171 S. W. 178, the jury fixed the value of a condemned lot at $43,000.00. In discussing the question of damages, we said:

“While it may be true that'the value of the property as fixed by the jury is unusually high, and much more than we would have fixed it, if the question were not for the jury, but one for our determination, yet where six Witnesses fix the value at from $2,500.00 to $5,000.00, and nine witnesses fix the value at from $40,000.00 to $65,000.00, we know of no rule of law that will permit us absolutely to ignore the testimony of the nine witnesses, and conclude that the six witnesses are correct in their opinion. Indeed,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Cooper
397 S.W.2d 47 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1965)
Pierson v. Commonwealth, Department of Highways
350 S.W.2d 487 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1961)
Bailey v. Harlan County
133 S.W.2d 58 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1939)
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Eastham
60 S.W.2d 361 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1933)
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Wadsworth Electric Manufacturing Co.
28 S.W.2d 650 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1930)
Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. Hargis
20 S.W.2d 991 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1929)
A. Arnold & Son Transfer & Storage Co. v. Weisiger
6 S.W.2d 1084 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 S.W. 849, 196 Ky. 788, 1922 Ky. LEXIS 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lexington-eastern-railway-co-v-sumner-kyctapp-1922.