Lexie v. Ohio Edison Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Lexie v. Ohio Edison Co.

677 N.E.2d 815, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1454, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3761

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 9, 1997

Docket97-317

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 677 N.E.2d 815 (Lexie v. Ohio Edison Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lexie v. Ohio Edison Co., 677 N.E.2d 815, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1454, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3761 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Trumbull App. No. 96-T-5384. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed January 30,1997:

“It is the order of this court that the record of the instant appeal shall be certified to the Supreme Court of Ohio for review and determination of the following legal issue: For purposes of determining when a property owner owes a duty of care to an employee of an independent contractor, does the [1455]*1455property owner ‘actively participate’ in the performance of the employee’s work by exercising exclusive control over an aspect of the employee’s working environment?”

The conflict case is DeHass v. Ohio Edison Co. (Sept. 15, 1993), Summit App. No. 15970, unreported, 1993 WL 347059.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trumbull App. No. 96-T-5384. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed January 30,1997:

“It is the order of this court that the record of the instant appeal shall be certified to the Supreme Court of Ohio for review and determination of the following legal issue: For purposes of determining when a property owner owes a duty of care to an employee of an independent contractor, does the [1455]*1455property owner ‘actively participate’ in the performance of the employee’s work by exercising exclusive control over an aspect of the employee’s working environment?”

The conflict case is DeHass v. Ohio Edison Co. (Sept. 15, 1993), Summit App. No. 15970, unreported, 1993 WL 347059.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents. Cook, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

677 N.E.2d 815, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1454, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lexie-v-ohio-edison-co-ohio-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack