Lewiston National Bank v. Tefft

53 P. 271, 6 Idaho 104, 1898 Ida. LEXIS 35
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided May 9, 1898·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

HUSTON, J.

— This is an action to foreclose a mortgage executed by Albert P. Tefft and Carrie M. Tefft. A joint judgment and decree was rendered against both. From this judgment and decree Carrie M. Tefft appeals. There were other parties made defendants, some of whom appeared; others made default.

Two of the defendants, Carrie M. Tefft and Mary E Osborn, join in the appeal. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that no notice of appeal was served upon Albert P. Tefft, against whom a joint judgment was rendered. Under the rule as given by this court in Lydon v. Godard, 5 Idaho, 607, 51 Pac. 459, Albert P. Tefft was an adverse party, and should have been served with notice of appeal. (See Lydon v. Godard, supra, and cases there cited.) Motion allowed, and appeal dismissed, with costs to respondent.

Sullivan, C. J., and Quarles, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewiston National Bank v. Tefft, 53 P. 271, 6 Idaho 104, 1898 Ida. LEXIS 35 (Idaho 1898).

53 P. 271 (Lewiston National Bank v. Tefft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sonleitner v. McLaren
20 P.2d 1014 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1933)
Quirk v. Bedal
248 P. 447 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1926)
Chapman v. Boehm
147 P. 289 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1915)
Berlin Machine Works v. Bradford-Kennedy Co.
123 P. 637 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1912)
Weeter Lumber Co. v. Fales
118 P. 289 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1911)
Diamond Bank v. Van Meter
108 P. 1042 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1910)
Doust v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co.
95 P. 209 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1908)
Titiman v. Alamance Mining Co.
74 P. 529 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1903)