Lewiston Falls Manuf. Co. v. Franklin Co.

54 Me. 402
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1867
StatusPublished

This text of 54 Me. 402 (Lewiston Falls Manuf. Co. v. Franklin Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewiston Falls Manuf. Co. v. Franklin Co., 54 Me. 402 (Me. 1867).

Opinion

AppletoN, O. J.

The only relief sought to be obtained by this bill is by way of injunction. The bill, however, does not pray specifically for an injunction.

The law seems well established in such case. An injunction will not ordinarily be granted under a prayer for general relief. It must be specifically prayed for. Story on Eq. Plead., §41. The prayer for an injunction must not only be in the prayer for relief, but in the prayer for process. Wood v. Bradell, 3 Sim., 273. When «a bill prays for relief by way of injunction, but does not pray for the process [405]*405of injunction, the process cannot be granted. Union Bank v. Kerr, 2 Maryland Chancery Decisions, 460.

Demurrer sustained-.

Cutting, WaltoN, Dickerson, DaNpoetii and Talley, J<T., concured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Me. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewiston-falls-manuf-co-v-franklin-co-me-1867.