Lewis's Estate

79 A. 921, 231 Pa. 60, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 791
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 20, 1911·No. Appeal, No. 157·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The widow of the testator, for whose benefit he created the trust which she and their only surviving child wish to have terminated, is still alive. Who will be the ultimate distributees of the fund under the-will of her husband cannot be determined until her death, and the court below could not have made a decree terminating the trust without the consent of all parties in interest. Such parties were not before it, for some who may ultimately participate in the fund may not yet be in existence.

Decree affirmed at appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis's Estate, 79 A. 921, 231 Pa. 60, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 791 (Pa. 1911).

79 A. 921 (Lewis's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thorp v. Commissioner
7 T.C. 921 (U.S. Tax Court, 1946)
Rickenbach Estate
34 A.2d 527 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
King v. York Trust Co.
122 A. 227 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Stafford's Estate
102 A. 222 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Gray v. Union Trust Co.
154 P. 306 (California Supreme Court, 1915)
Harrar's Estate
91 A. 503 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)