Lewison v. Gabros Construction Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lewison v. Gabros Construction Corp.

371 So. 2d 232, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21122

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 29, 1979

DocketNo. 78-699

StatusPublished

This text of 371 So. 2d 232 (Lewison v. Gabros Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewison v. Gabros Construction Corp., 371 So. 2d 232, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21122 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant below, in a mechanic’s lien foreclosure action brings this appeal from a money judgment awarded to appel-lee after a non-jury trial. After carefully considering each of the points raised by appellant on appeal, we are of the opinion that appellant has failed to show any reversible error; therefore, based upon the following cases and the general rules of appeals, the judgment appealed is affirmed. See Rice Window Manufacturing Co. v. Evans, 71 So.2d 164 (Fla.1954); Phillips v. Sanchez, 35 Fla. 187, 17 So. 363 (1895); Pilafin v. Cherry, 355 So.2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Damiano v. Weinstein, 355 So.2d 819 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); McGuire v. Consolidated Electrical Supply, Inc., 329 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Deltona Corporation v. Indian Palms, Inc., 323 So.2d 282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Glusman v. Lieberman, 285 So.2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); Emery v. International Glass and Manufacturing, Inc., 249 So.2d 496 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971); Phelps v. T. O. Mahaffee, Inc., 156 So.2d 900 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963); and § 59.041, Fla.Stats. (1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant below, in a mechanic’s lien foreclosure action brings this appeal from a money judgment awarded to appel-lee after a non-jury trial. After carefully considering each of the points raised by appellant on appeal, we are of the opinion that appellant has failed to show any reversible error; therefore, based upon the following cases and the general rules of appeals, the judgment appealed is affirmed. See Rice Window Manufacturing Co. v. Evans, 71 So.2d 164 (Fla.1954); Phillips v. Sanchez, 35 Fla. 187, 17 So. 363 (1895); Pilafin v. Cherry, 355 So.2d 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Damiano v. Weinstein, 355 So.2d 819 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); McGuire v. Consolidated Electrical Supply, Inc., 329 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Deltona Corporation v. Indian Palms, Inc., 323 So.2d 282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Glusman v. Lieberman, 285 So.2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); Emery v. International Glass and Manufacturing, Inc., 249 So.2d 496 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971); Phelps v. T. O. Mahaffee, Inc., 156 So.2d 900 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963); and § 59.041, Fla.Stats. (1977).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

371 So. 2d 232, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewison-v-gabros-construction-corp-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack