Lewisboro Associates Co. v. Lyden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lewisboro Associates Co. v. Lyden

300 A.D.2d 365, 751 N.Y.S.2d 855

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 300 A.D.2d 365 (Lewisboro Associates Co. v. Lyden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewisboro Associates Co. v. Lyden, 300 A.D.2d 365, 751 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to real property, and for a judgment declaring a certain contract for the sale of real property to be unenforceable, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered July 8, 1999, as denied their motion for partial summary judgment on the cause of action for a declaratory judgment and dismissing the defendant’s first counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court [366]*366correctly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the first cause of action for a declaratory judgment and dismissing the defendant’s first counterclaim. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to real property, and for a judgment declaring a certain contract for the sale of real property to be unenforceable, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered July 8, 1999, as denied their motion for partial summary judgment on the cause of action for a declaratory judgment and dismissing the defendant’s first counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court [366]*366correctly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the first cause of action for a declaratory judgment and dismissing the defendant’s first counterclaim. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 A.D.2d 365, 751 N.Y.S.2d 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewisboro-associates-co-v-lyden-nyappdiv-2002.