Lewis v. Wall

114 P. 856, 84 Kan. 662, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 388
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedApril 8, 1911
DocketNo. 16,735
StatusPublished

This text of 114 P. 856 (Lewis v. Wall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewis v. Wall, 114 P. 856, 84 Kan. 662, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 388 (kan 1911).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appellee made no appearance and made no presentation of this case in this court. This action appears to be one of forcible entry and detainer, and was brought by the appellee against the appellant. The appellee claimed title under a tax deed, under which he had never had possession of the property. The appellant claimed ownership under a verbal contract to purchase with the holder of an earlier tax deed, and had been in possession as a tenant and under such agreement for about two years. He had never been a tenant of the appellee.

[663]*663The evidence fails to show that the appellant made an unlawful and 'forcible entry to the lands and 'tenements, or, having lawfully and peaceably entered therein, that he unlawfully and by force held the same. Indeed, the real purpose of the action seems to be to try the title to the property between the appellee and the former tax-title holder, under whom the appellant was in possession, and for this purpose forcible entry and detainer is not the proper form of action.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 P. 856, 84 Kan. 662, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-wall-kan-1911.