Lewis v. Unknown Police Officer

Fourth Circuit

Lewis v. Unknown Police Officer

49 F. App'x 447

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 30, 2002

DocketNo. 02-1704

StatusPublished

This text of 49 F. App'x 447 (Lewis v. Unknown Police Officer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. Unknown Police Officer, 49 F. App'x 447 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Orville Lewis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lewis v. Unknown Police Officer, No. CA-02-141-3 (E.D. Va. June 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Orville Lewis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lewis v. Unknown Police Officer, No. CA-02-141-3 (E.D. Va. June 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 F. App'x 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-unknown-police-officer-ca4-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack