Lewis v. United States
This text of 214 F.2d 853 (Lewis v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decision of the Municipal Court of Appeals, holding that the occupational tax imposed by Chapter 27A of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 3290 (1952), on the business of accepting wagers, is constitutional in its application to the District of Columbia. United States v. Lewis, D.C.Mun.App.1953, 100 A.2d 40. That decision is clearly correct, in view of United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22, 73 S.Ct. 510, 97 L.Ed. 754, rehearing denied, 1953, 345 U.S. 931, 73 S.Ct. 778, 97 L.Ed. 1360. “Of course Congress may tax what it also forbids.” United States v. Stafoff, 1923, 260 U.S. 477 at page 480, 43 S.Ct. 197 at page 199, 67 L.Ed. 358.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 F.2d 853, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 205, 45 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1841, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-united-states-cadc-1954.