Lewis v. United States

214 F.2d 853, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 205, 45 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1841, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4743
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 10, 1954·No. 12009_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Municipal Court of Appeals, holding that the occupational tax imposed by Chapter 27A of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 3290 (1952), on the business of accepting wagers, is constitutional in its application to the District of Columbia. United States v. Lewis, D.C.Mun.App.1953, 100 A.2d 40. That decision is clearly correct, in view of United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22, 73 S.Ct. 510, 97 L.Ed. 754, rehearing denied, 1953, 345 U.S. 931, 73 S.Ct. 778, 97 L.Ed. 1360. “Of course Congress may tax what it also forbids.” United States v. Stafoff, 1923, 260 U.S. 477 at page 480, 43 S.Ct. 197 at page 199, 67 L.Ed. 358.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. United States, 214 F.2d 853, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 205, 45 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1841, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4743 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

214 F.2d 853 (Lewis v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hicks v. District of Columbia
197 A.2d 154 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1964)