Lewis v. United States

214 F.2d 853, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 205, 45 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1841, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4743
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 10, 1954
Docket12009_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 F.2d 853 (Lewis v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewis v. United States, 214 F.2d 853, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 205, 45 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1841, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4743 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Municipal Court of Appeals, holding that the occupational tax imposed by Chapter 27A of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 3290 (1952), on the business of accepting wagers, is constitutional in its application to the District of Columbia. United States v. Lewis, D.C.Mun.App.1953, 100 A.2d 40. That decision is clearly correct, in view of United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22, 73 S.Ct. 510, 97 L.Ed. 754, rehearing denied, 1953, 345 U.S. 931, 73 S.Ct. 778, 97 L.Ed. 1360. “Of course Congress may tax what it also forbids.” United States v. Stafoff, 1923, 260 U.S. 477 at page 480, 43 S.Ct. 197 at page 199, 67 L.Ed. 358.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hicks v. District of Columbia
197 A.2d 154 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 F.2d 853, 94 U.S. App. D.C. 205, 45 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1841, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-united-states-cadc-1954.