Lewis v. United States

49 F.2d 272, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3203
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedApril 24, 1931
DocketNo. 364
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 F.2d 272 (Lewis v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewis v. United States, 49 F.2d 272, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3203 (10th Cir. 1931).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of three sales of whisky. The errors assigned and specified are directed to the court’s instructions to the jury. There was evidence, if believed, that would have supported the conclusion that appellant was not the principal in one or more of the transactions, but an aider and abetter. On that subject the court did not err in giving the jury the substance of section 550, tit. 18, U. S. Code (18 USCA § 550). The two other specifications cover excerpts from the instruction on entrapment, which was urged as a defense. The forepart of the instruction gave a correct definition of entrapment, and the excerpts which followed might have been omitted appropriately; but when the instruction as a whole is considered we áre of the opinion the excerpts could not have misled the jury as to [273]*273the law on that subject. Moreover, there was no evidence that tended to support that defense, and the charge in that respect, if error, was brought about by the insistence of appellant on a false issue. If the contention he now makes is sound, he misled the court and cannot complain. Affirmed. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 F.2d 272, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-united-states-ca10-1931.