Lewis v. Times Pub. Co.

185 F.2d 457, 19 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 66,058
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 1950
Docket13295
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 185 F.2d 457 (Lewis v. Times Pub. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewis v. Times Pub. Co., 185 F.2d 457, 19 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 66,058 (5th Cir. 1950).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219, the suit was for a money demand, overtime compensation, and liquidated damages.

Plaintiff’s request for a jury denied, the cause went to trial before the district judge without a jury and judgment was rendered for the defendant.

Appellant, plaintiff below, is here assigning error on the refusal of his jury request and on the failure to render judgment for him.

Appellee urges upon us that the case was not one requiring a jury, and it was not error to refuse the request. He urges further that there was no substantial evidence upon which a jury might properly have returned a verdict for plaintiff, and, if the refusal was error, it was harmless. Burke Grain Co. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., 8 Cir., 94 F.2d 458.

It is quite clear that the case was one requiring a jury, and that because of the refusal of plaintiff’s request, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for jury trial. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Helmly v. Stone Container Corp.
957 F. Supp. 1274 (S.D. Georgia, 1997)
McConnell v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.
802 F. Supp. 1484 (E.D. Texas, 1992)
Mitchell v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del.
747 F. Supp. 1446 (M.D. Florida, 1990)
Paulina Castillo v. Ercell Givens
704 F.2d 181 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Marshall v. Morse Operations, Inc.
514 F. Supp. 604 (S.D. Florida, 1981)
Marshall v. Hanioti Hotel Corp.
490 F. Supp. 1020 (N.D. Georgia, 1980)
Lorillard v. Pons
434 U.S. 575 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Jaeger v. American Cyanamid Co.
442 F. Supp. 1270 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1978)
Altman v. Stevens Fashion Fabrics
441 F. Supp. 1318 (N.D. California, 1977)
Cleverly v. Western Electric Co.
69 F.R.D. 348 (W.D. Missouri, 1975)
Chilton v. National Cash Register Company
370 F. Supp. 660 (S.D. Ohio, 1974)
Ochoa v. American Oil Company
338 F. Supp. 914 (S.D. Texas, 1972)
Wirtz v. Thompson Packers, Inc.
224 F. Supp. 960 (E.D. Louisiana, 1963)
Wirtz v. Robert E. Bob Adair, Inc.
224 F. Supp. 750 (W.D. Arkansas, 1963)
Steffen v. Farmers Elevator Service Co.
109 F. Supp. 16 (N.D. Iowa, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 F.2d 457, 19 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 66,058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-times-pub-co-ca5-1950.