Lewis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Lewis v. State

77 S.W.2d 1112, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 672

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 2, 1935

DocketNo. 17162

StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.W.2d 1112 (Lewis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. State, 77 S.W.2d 1112, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 672 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for a simple assault; the punishment being assessed at a fine of ?5 against each appellant.

No statement of facts is brought forward. It is impossible to appraise the two bills of exception found in the record without being apprised of the facts. Without intending to concede that the bills reflect error, we observe that it frequently happens during the trial of a case that error is committed, yet it would not be held such as to demand a reversal in the light of the entire record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for a simple assault; the punishment being assessed at a fine of ?5 against each appellant.

No statement of facts is brought forward. It is impossible to appraise the two bills of exception found in the record without being apprised of the facts. Without intending to concede that the bills reflect error, we observe that it frequently happens during the trial of a case that error is committed, yet it would not be held such as to demand a reversal in the light of the entire record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 S.W.2d 1112, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-state-texcrimapp-1935.