Lewis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Lewis v. State

77 S.W.2d 1112, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 672

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 Tex. Crim. 311 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 2, 1935·No. No. 17162·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for a simple assault; the punishment being assessed at a fine of ?5 against each appellant.

No statement of facts is brought forward. It is impossible to appraise the two bills of exception found in the record without being apprised of the facts. Without intending to concede that the bills reflect error, we observe that it frequently happens during the trial of a case that error is committed, yet it would not be held such as to demand a reversal in the light of the entire record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for a simple assault; the punishment being assessed at a fine of ?5 against each appellant.

No statement of facts is brought forward. It is impossible to appraise the two bills of exception found in the record without being apprised of the facts. Without intending to concede that the bills reflect error, we observe that it frequently happens during the trial of a case that error is committed, yet it would not be held such as to demand a reversal in the light of the entire record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Lewis v. State, 77 S.W.2d 1112, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 672 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

77 S.W.2d 1112 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.