Lewis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Lewis v. State

1919 OK CR 248, 182 P. 733, 16 Okla. Crim. 699, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 214

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 19, 1919

DocketNo. A-3308.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 248 (Lewis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. State, 1919 OK CR 248, 182 P. 733, 16 Okla. Crim. 699, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 214 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted on a charge that he did have unlawfully in his possession six one-gallon cans of alcohol, with the intention of selling the same. His punishment was fixed at 30 days' confinement in the county jail, and a fine of $200. From the judgment rendered in pursuance of the verdict an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on March 30', 1918, a petition in error with ease-made.

No briefs have been filed. When the case was called for final submission no appearance was made in behalf of the plaintiff in error. The Attorney General has moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.

Finding no available error in the record, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted on a charge that he did have unlawfully in his possession six one-gallon cans of alcohol, with the intention of selling the same. His punishment was fixed at 30 days' confinement in the county jail, and a fine of $200. From the judgment rendered in pursuance of the verdict an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on March 30', 1918, a petition in error with ease-made.

No briefs have been filed. When the case was called for final submission no appearance was made in behalf of the plaintiff in error. The Attorney General has moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.

Finding no available error in the record, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 248, 182 P. 733, 16 Okla. Crim. 699, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.