Lewis v. State
This text of 1910 OK CR 38 (Lewis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The time originally granted for making and serving a case-made had expired when the case-made was served. The extension of time in which the case-made might be *449 served having been made after the time originally granted had expired was void. There is no certificate by the clerk of the district conrt to what purports to be the transcript of the record. The clerk of the district conrt must attest the signature of the district judge to the case-made, and must also certify to the accuracy of the transcript. There is nothing before this court which we can consider.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1910 OK CR 38, 106 P. 647, 3 Okla. Crim. 448, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-state-oklacrimapp-1910.