Lewis v. State
65 S.E. 842, 6 Ga. App. 779, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 458
Opinion
In a prosecution for the illicit sale of intoxicating liquors the jury are authorized to convict where it appears, from the evidence, that the defendant was asked if he had any whisky, and he replied that he had, and delivered something in a bottle, which he said was whisky, and' for which he accepted money, although the person to whom it was delivered was too drunk to tell whether it was whisky or not, and although the defendant, at the trial, said it was ginger-ale. Tompkins v. State, 2 Ga. App. 639 (58 S. E. 1111). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lewis v. State, 65 S.E. 842, 6 Ga. App. 779, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 458 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).
65 S.E. 842 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sims v. State
196 S.E. 111 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Shefton v. State
161 S.E. 281 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Dunn v. State
123 S.E. 905 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Jenkins v. State
101 S.E. 691 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Smith v. State
86 S.E. 283 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Howard v. State
65 S.E. 1076 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)